Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.7
How Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) and Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic) compare on price, context window and best-fit use case.
In short: Gemini 3.1 Pro is best for long-document and multimodal workloads, RAG over huge corpora, and Google Cloud-native apps, while Claude Opus 4.7 suits production coding agents, long-horizon workflow automation, and document or finance agent work. On price it's $2.00 (under 200K; $4.00 above) vs $5.00 per 1M input tokens; on context, 2M tokens vs 1M tokens.
Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro is the more capable pick (Bq score 92 vs 90). Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if its fit is closer to your workload: production coding agents, long-horizon workflow automation, and document or finance agent work.
| Spec | Gemini 3.1 Pro | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | |
| Context window | 2M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Input price /1M | $2.00 (under 200K; $4.00 above) | $5.00 |
| Output price /1M | $12.00 (under 200K; $18.00 above) | $25.00 |
| Modalities | text, image, audio, video | text, image |
| Best for | Long-document and multimodal workloads, RAG over huge corpora, and Google Cloud-native apps. | Production coding agents, long-horizon workflow automation, and document or finance agent work. |
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- Largest mainstream context (2M)
- Strong multimodal reasoning
- Native Google ecosystem integration
- Competitive pricing
Claude Opus 4.7
- #1 by coding-agent spend on OpenRouter
- Long-horizon async/agentic reliability
- Strong finance/document agent results
- Multi-session and file-system memory