Laguna M.1
Poolside's open-weights coding model (April 2026, Apache 2.0): a 225B MoE (23B active) trained in-house on 30T tokens, posting strong agentic-coding results (SWE-bench Verified 65.4%, SWE-Bench Pro 46.9%) with native reasoning plus tool calling at a very low price. A promotional free endpoint exists; free-tier inputs may be used for training.
Laguna M.1 strengths
- Strong SWE-bench agentic coding
- Apache 2.0 open weights
- Native reasoning + tool calling
- Very cheap API
- Efficient 23B-active MoE
Pricing & context
| Context window | 262K tokens (32K max output) |
| Input price /1M | $0.20 |
| Output price /1M | $0.40 |
| Modalities | text |
Cost guide: a typical call of about 10K input + 2K output tokens costs roughly $0.003 at list prices. Worth modelling against cheaper tiers before committing high-volume traffic.
When to choose Laguna M.1
Laguna M.1 is best for agentic software engineering: codebase exploration, multi-file edits, test loops and CLI agents. If your workload is more cost-sensitive, weigh it against gpt-oss-120b (≈$0.03 input /1M) first.
Laguna M.1 FAQ
How much does Laguna M.1 cost?
Laguna M.1 is priced at $0.20 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens (public API list price), with a 262K tokens (32K max output) context window. A typical call of about 10K input and 2K output tokens costs roughly $0.003.
What is Laguna M.1 best for?
Laguna M.1 by Poolside is best for agentic software engineering: codebase exploration, multi-file edits, test loops and CLI agents.
How does Laguna M.1 pricing compare to Kimi K2.6?
Laguna M.1 input costs $0.20 per 1M tokens versus ≈$0.60 for Kimi K2.6, roughly 3.0x less expensive on input. Output is $0.40 vs ≈$2.50.
Is Laguna M.1 multimodal?
Laguna M.1 supports text.
Other models
All models →| 01 | Claude Fable 5 | Anthropic | $10.00 | → |
| 02 | GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $5.00 | → |
| 03 | Claude Opus 4.8 | Anthropic | $5.00 | → |
| 04 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | $2.00 (under 200K; $4.00 above) | → |