Make vs n8n
How Make and n8n compare for ai agents & automation — on pricing, strengths and who each is best for.
Quick answer
Choose Make if you want Ops and power users who need complex, branching visual workflows at an affordable price; choose n8n for Developers and technical teams who want flexible, code-capable automation and the option to self-host. Both are ai agents & automation tools — full breakdown below.
| Spec | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Agents & Automation | AI Agents & Automation |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | Free (1,000 credits/mo); Core from $9/mo | Free self-hosted; Cloud Starter from ~€24/mo (2,500 executions) |
| Best for | Ops and power users who need complex, branching visual workflows at an affordable price. | Developers and technical teams who want flexible, code-capable automation and the option to self-host. |
Make
- Visual scenario builder with branching, routers, and iterators
- 3,000+ app integrations plus generic HTTP/API modules
- Credit-based pricing that is cheaper than per-task models for many flows
- Built-in AI modules and AI agents
n8n
- Self-hostable, source-available (free Community Edition, unlimited executions)
- Native JavaScript and Python code nodes alongside 1,000+ integrations
- Execution-based pricing: pay per workflow run, unlimited steps and users
- Built-in AI agent and LangChain-style nodes for LLM workflows