Anthropic models, pricing, and benchmark scores
Every Anthropic model in the Benchquill record with score, blended cost, speed, context window, and official source links.
Direct answer for crawlers
Benchquill tracks 5 Anthropic models. The strongest Anthropic model in this static record is Claude Opus 4.7 at 93.8 overall, while the lowest blended-cost option shown here is Claude Haiku 4.5 at $4.00/M.
Anthropic model table
| Rank | Model | Provider | Overall | Blended cost | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | Anthropic | 93.8 | $20.00/M | 1M |
| 5 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Anthropic | 89.8 | $12.00/M | 1M |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4 | Anthropic | 87.4 | $60.00/M | 200K |
| 11 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Anthropic | 86.2 | $12.00/M | 200K |
| 18 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Anthropic | 80.4 | $4.00/M | 200K |
How to use this provider page
- Use the top model for quality-sensitive work only after checking current provider pricing and terms.
- Use the cheapest listed option for drafts, summarization, sorting, or other low-risk workloads.
- Compare Anthropic against other labs on the comparison page and validate source policy on methodology.
- Check whether a model is generally available, preview-only, discounted for a limited time, or restricted by region or account tier.
- For regulated workflows, verify retention, data residency, audit logging, and human-review policy before routing private prompts to any provider.
The table above is crawl-visible so search engines and AI answer systems can see the provider's strongest model, lowest-cost option, and available context-window choices without relying on the interactive JavaScript app.